Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.
Source: http://video.msnbc.msn.com/cnbc/50300761/
ufc 143 what time does the super bowl start super bowl 2012 josephine baker ben gazzara nfl hall of fame 2012 ufc diaz vs condit
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
How To Structure An Online Joint Venture For ... - Name.com
HOW TO STRUCTURE AN ONLINE JOINT VENTURE FOR MAXIMUM BENEFIT
When you are getting started online, one of the first things that you need to build is a customer base. ?Of course, that is difficult to do if you are new and no one knows about you or your products. ?To overcome this you will have to grow your following using SEO, PR and social media.
However, one thing that you can do to jump start the building of your customer base is to leverage the following of someone who has already established themselves in the niche you are entering. ?Many online marketers have participated in?a joint venture?with a marketer who has already developed his?own customer base and seen impressive results.
In a joint venture you are working with another marketer to create and deliver a new product for the marketplace. ?This works well for new marketers when they have an innovative product or service to sell to the niche, but do not necessarily have a solid customer base. Therefore the established marketer is lending her?name, market power and customer database to the project.
When you are looking for potential joint venture partners, a prudent way to make your case to them?is to purchase their product (if possible). ?This will typically give you contact information that the established marketer doesn?t share with non business partners. ?Another factor to keep in mind is that these individuals will have likely received joint venture requests before yours. ?Most of the requests they receive will be hastily crafted emails, which the marketer will find easy to turn down. ?Your approach should be different (consider sending a letter instead of an email) and professional, so that it stands out from the rest.
To create a well run joint venture, the parties typically set up a formal agreement?of some kind once they have decided on the various responsibilities they need to take to bring their product to market. ?When you are first starting, it is typical to accept less than 50% of the profits, as well as doing more than 50% of the work. ?The joint venture benefits you a great deal because not only will you be gaining new customers, but you will also be building your customer database.
belize adele lyrics best new artist 2012 grammys foo fighters nikki minaj grammys
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Bill Walsh: America's Business Expert - Powerteam Success ...
Bill Walsh? is the CEO/Founder of Business Coaching/Venture Capital firm Powerteam International. Bill hosts and speaks at events all over the world! His passion is to empower entrepreneurs and business owners to create massive success. He loves to help people to understand specifically what it takes to build successful companies. He is an accomplished author, speaker, radio personality and movie celebrity, He has a very successful background in finance and marketing. He has spent two decades working with start-ups to major global brands increasing sales, productivity and overall success. He is an innovator with a remarkable ability to determine and dictate success strategy to seize global market opportunities.
For everyone that owns a business or would like to capitalize the entrepreneurial dream his message will enlighten them with knowledge and action principles to turn that passion into success! Bill has an extensive background in foreign currency trading, real estate development and building companies around the world. Over the past two decades, he has specialized in helping companies launch, grow and create exponential valuation in the market. The Rainmaker Summit and WIN University? programs offered through Powerteam are designed to assist entrepreneurs in creating the focus, plans and partnerships required to build multi-million dollar companies!
www.billwalsh360.com
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 Power Hour Live Broadcast
9 PM Eastern ? 8 PM Central ? 7 PM MTN ? 6 PM Pacific
Conference Dial-in Number: 1-605-475-4392
Access Code PIN: 115594#
robert griffin iii dontari poe space shuttle nyc monkeypox nick perry 30 rock live nfl draft picks 2012
Obama faces backlash on possible Hagel nomination for Pentagon
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Pro-Israel groups, neoconservatives and even some former colleagues on Capitol Hill are confronting President Barack Obama with a growing backlash against Chuck Hagel, the ex-Republican senator tipped as his leading candidate for defense secretary.
Obama's aides have given no sign of dropping Hagel from consideration - even after several American Jewish leaders privately complained about his policy views, most notably on Israel and Iran, at a White House-hosted Hanukkah party last week, according to one attendee.
But what has become clear in recent days is that the Democratic president will have a Senate confirmation fight on his hands if he decides to nominate the former Nebraska lawmaker, regarded as a moderate Republican, to replace Leon Panetta at the Pentagon.
The White House is preparing for a major realignment of Obama's national security team, possibly by the end of this week, sources familiar with the process have said. But the announcement could be delayed by the difficult "fiscal cliff" negotiations with congressional Republicans.
That could provide more time for Hagel's critics to marshal opposition to his nomination, in public and behind the scenes. But even they are skeptical of being able to derail it.
Obama himself has faced questions from American Jewish leaders about his approach to close U.S. ally Israel, especially given his strained relations with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and may decide to take a risk with Hagel.
"This is a nomination that could be toxic to some degree for the White House," a Senate Republican foreign policy aide said. "Do they really want this in the first months of a second term?"
Some of Israel's leading U.S. supporters contend that Hagel, who left the Senate in 2008, at times opposed Israel's interests, voting several times against U.S. sanctions on Iran, and made disparaging remarks about the influence of what he called a "Jewish lobby" in Washington.
William Kristol of the conservative Weekly Standard wrote in a recent column that Hagel "has anti-Israel, pro-appeasement-of-Iran bona fides."
While declining to discuss Hagel's record on Israel, White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters last Thursday that "the president thinks very highly of Senator Hagel."
Hagel's office has remain tight-lipped and had no immediate comment.
J Street, a liberal American Jewish group, said it was "appalled by efforts surfacing in recent days to question his commitment to the state of Israel and to Middle East peace."
But The Washington Post weighed in late on Tuesday with an editorial declaring that Hagel was "not the right choice."
It chided him for advocating deep defense cuts and said he was out-of-step on Iran for voicing skepticism that force might eventually be needed to stop its nuclear program.
REPUBLICAN MISGIVINGS
On Tuesday even some of Hagel's former Republican colleagues expressed misgivings about him.
Asked about Hagel's 2006 statement that the "Jewish lobby intimidates a lot of people here," Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said he would "have to answer for that comment" if he is nominated.
"And he'll have to answer about why he thought it was a good idea to directly negotiate with Hamas and why he objected to the European Union declaring Hezbollah a terrorist organization," said Graham, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. "He's been a friend, he has a stellar military record, but these comments disturb a lot of people."
After leaving office, Hagel urged Obama to open talks with Hamas, which is sworn to Israel's destruction
Senator John McCain of Arizona insisted "we would review his entire record" but declined to "make a judgment until he's nominated."
Ironically, a Hagel nomination might be better received by Democrats - though they too might be wary of his contrarian reputation.
Many Republicans consider Hagel suspect. He was an early dissenter on the Iraq war - an issue that helped Obama rise to prominence - and crossed the aisle to endorse the president in his successful re-election bid this year.
On top of that, since leaving the Senate after two terms, he has been a vocal critic of his own party's fiscal policies.
Obama is said to feel comfortable with Hagel. The two traveled together to the Middle East during the 2008 campaign.
He currently co-chairs Obama's Intelligence Advisory Board, and his confirmation would put the Pentagon under a decorated Vietnam War veteran and give Obama's Cabinet a bipartisan cast.
Christopher Preble, vice president of the libertarian Cato Institute, wrote that Hagel would be an excellent choice and would help keep the U.S. military from undertaking further "quixotic nation-building missions."
But high-profile opposition to Hagel's possible nomination is growing. Abe Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League, told The Washington Post that his record "relating to Israel and the U.S.-Israel relationship is, at best, disturbing, and at worst, very troubling."
Josh Block, president of The Israel Project, a pro-Israel group that describes itself as a nonpartisan educational organization, said Hagel's positions were "well outside the mainstream Democratic and Republican consensus."
Some of the negative buzz surrounding Hagel has made its way into Israeli media. "Hagel is a Republican with a problematic voting record on Israel," The Jerusalem Post said on Monday.
Also in the mix for the Pentagon job are Michele Flournoy, a former undersecretary of defense for policy, and Ashton Carter, the current deputy defense secretary.
(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by Xavier Briand)
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/obama-faces-backlash-possible-hagel-nomination-pentagon-035052232.html
the watchmen whitney houston dies dolly parton i will always love you beverly hilton hotel whitney houston found dead i will always love you whitney houston 2012 grammy awards
Beyond the Internet: Week 48 Teachers | Family history across the ...
Beyond the Internet
This week I?m belatedly writing Week 48 in my?Beyond the Internet?series in which I explore the sources of information beyond our computer screens and this week?s topic is Occupations ? Teachers.
I wrote a few posts early in the year about school admissions and other school records, which will obviously be of relevance if you have teaching ancestors.
However you?re probably looking for more personal information about their careers.
I have no teachers in my family tree but Mr Cassmob?s is fairly littered with them so much of the information I?ve acquired has come from them. Some are his immediate ancestors, one is our daughter, and others go back to the early-mid 19th century.
Where to look
The first port of call will be the relevant archive for the area where they taught.
If they were in a religious school, you may have to approach the school or religious order they worked for (not so easy, sometimes).
I?d also look at reference libraries to see if there?s more general information about their records.
?
?Their inspection reports: Remember those school visits when we thought the inspector was only assessing us, but in reality was probably mainly interested in the teacher, and whether they?d taught the necessary curriculum to the right standard. They must have been intimidating for the teachers as 50 years later we met a lady in Alotau who remembered her mother being inspected by Mr Cassmob?s father (who could do intimidating quite well in his professional role).
Their academic training: whether they had teachers? college training, university, or were thrown in largely at the deep end to sink or swim.
Their history in schools: For example: my in-laws were both teachers and both were required to establish small bush schools in rural Victoria with absolutely minimal training. In their specific case this experience was no doubt invaluable as they launched and taught at new schools in Papua New Guinea. ?Did your ancestors teach in large urban schools, small multi-class schools or even one-teacher schools? Who was in their class? Did their own children have to call them ?Mrs Cass? in the classroom, for example.
Books: You may find some reference to your teaching ancestors in books relating to the areas where they taught, or specialised books on education.
?Gazettes:?Government and Education?Their postings may feature in the various gazettes ?check them out. (I?m indebted to Rosemary Kopittke who alerted me to the education gazettes last year). Goulds have a range of the Queensland Education Gazettes which you can see here.
Teachers really are pivotal to the development of a community?s children, a debt we all owe them, as they work so hard to educate and care for their students. In the past week we?ve also seen their heroism as they protected children, sometimes with their own lives.
So let?s all say a huge ?thank you? to the teachers who?ve helped form us into who we are today.?
Did you have a pivotal teacher: if so who was it??
The teaching images are from Microsoft clipart.
Source: http://cassmob.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/beyond-the-internet-week-48-teachers/
la dodgers lawrence o donnell magic johnson jetblue pilot solicitor general neighborhood watch dennis rodman
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Benghazi review slams State Department on security
FILE - In this April 11, 2011, file photo, then U.S. envoy Chris Stevens attends meetings at the Tibesty Hotel where an African Union delegation was meeting with opposition leaders in Benghazi, Libya. An independent review board is set to reveal its findings on the Sept. 11 attack in Libya that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans, a report the administration hopes will bolster its assertion that diplomats took all reasonable measures to anticipate and respond to the violence, and end months of finger-pointing and recriminations over whether the deaths could have been avoided. Diplomats and intelligence officers alike have testified to the rising risk in Benghazi and growing debate over how to improve security prior to the attack, set against Ambassadors Chris Stevens' decision to keep the Benghazi diplomatic post open and even visit there on Sept. 11. (AP Photo/Ben Curtis, File)
FILE - In this April 11, 2011, file photo, then U.S. envoy Chris Stevens attends meetings at the Tibesty Hotel where an African Union delegation was meeting with opposition leaders in Benghazi, Libya. An independent review board is set to reveal its findings on the Sept. 11 attack in Libya that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans, a report the administration hopes will bolster its assertion that diplomats took all reasonable measures to anticipate and respond to the violence, and end months of finger-pointing and recriminations over whether the deaths could have been avoided. Diplomats and intelligence officers alike have testified to the rising risk in Benghazi and growing debate over how to improve security prior to the attack, set against Ambassadors Chris Stevens' decision to keep the Benghazi diplomatic post open and even visit there on Sept. 11. (AP Photo/Ben Curtis, File)
WASHINGTON (AP) ? The leaders of an independent panel that blamed systematic State Department management and leadership failures for gross security lapses in the deadly Sept. 11 attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya will explain their findings to Congress on Wednesday.
The two most senior members of the Accountability Review Board are set to testify behind closed doors before the House and Senate foreign affairs committees on the classified findings of their harshly critical report.
An unclassified version released late Tuesday said serious bureaucratic mismanagement was responsible for the inadequate security at the mission in Benghazi where the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were killed.
"Systematic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of the State Department resulted in a Special Mission security posture that was inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took place," the panel said.
Despite those deficiencies, the board determined that no individual officials ignored or violated their duties and recommended no disciplinary action. But it also said poor performance by senior managers should be grounds for disciplinary recommendations in the future.
Wednesday's classified testimony from the review board ? retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering and a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen ? will set the stage for open hearings the next day with Deputy Secretary of State William Burns, who is in charge of policy, and Deputy Secretary of State Thomas Nides, who is in charge of management.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was to have appeared at Thursday's hearing but canceled after fainting and sustaining a concussion last week while recovering from a stomach virus that dehydrated her. Clinton is under doctors' orders to rest.
In a letter that accompanied the transmission of the report to Capitol Hill, Clinton thanked the board for its "clear-eyed, serious look at serious systemic challenges" and said she accepted all of its 29 recommendations to improve security at high-threat embassies and consulates.
She said the department had already begun to implement some of the recommendations. They include increasing by several hundred the number of Marine guards stationed at diplomatic missions throughout the world; relying less on local security forces for protection at embassies, consulates and other offices; and increasing hiring and deployment of highly trained Diplomatic Security agents at at-risk posts.
Clinton agreed with the panel's finding that Congress must fully fund the State Department's security initiatives. The panel found that budget constraints in the past had led some management officials to emphasize savings over security, including rejecting numerous requests from the Benghazi mission and the embassy in Tripoli for enhanced protection.
It singled out the Bureau of Diplomatic Security and the Bureau of Near East Affairs for criticism, saying there appeared to be a lack of cooperation and confusion over protection at the mission in Benghazi, a city in Eastern Libya that was relatively lawless after the revolution that toppled Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi.
But it appeared to break little new ground about the timeline of the Benghazi attack during which Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens, information specialist Sean Smith and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods ? who were contractors working for the CIA ? were killed. Stevens' slaying was the first of a U.S. ambassador since 1988.
The board determined that there had been no immediate, specific tactical warning of a potential attack on the 11th anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001. However, the report said there had been several worrisome incidents in the run-up to the attack that should have set off warning bells.
It did confirm, though, that contrary to initial accounts, there was no protest outside the consulate. It said responsibility for the incident rested entirely with the terrorists who attacked the mission.
In the immediate aftermath of the attack, administration officials linked the attack to the spreading protests that had begun in Cairo earlier that day over an American-made, anti-Islamic film. Those comments came after evidence already pointed to a distinct militant attack.
United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice appeared on numerous TV talk shows the Sunday after the attack and used the administration talking points linking it to the film. An ensuing brouhaha in the heat of the presidential campaign eventually led her to withdraw her name from consideration to replace Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of state in President Barack Obama's second term.
While criticizing State Department management in Washington along with the local militia force and contract guards that the mission depended on for protection, the report said U.S. personnel on the ground in Benghazi "performed with courage and readiness to risk their lives to protect their colleagues in a near-impossible situation."
It said the response by Diplomatic Security agents on the scene and CIA operatives at a nearby compound that later came under attack itself had been "timely and appropriate" and absolved the military from any blame. "There was simply not enough time for armed U.S. military assets to have made a difference," it said.
The report also discounted speculation that officials in Washington had refused appeals for additional help after the attack had begun.
"The Board found no evidence of any undue delays in decision making or denial of support from Washington or from the military combatant commanders," it said. To the contrary, the report said the evacuation of the dead and wounded 12 hours after the initial attack was due to "exceptional U.S. government coordination and military response" that helped save the lives of two seriously wounded Americans.
Associated Press2012 white house correspondents dinner forrest gump bernard hopkins nfl draft grades devils dodgers rachel maddow
Re:Galaxy Ace
| December 18, 2012 10:24 AM ?|? #2 Good afternoon chrislucas & welcome to the forums, ? First of all I would like to apologise for the service that you have received, we never like to hear that a customer is dissatisfied. I would like to take this opportunity to change the experience that you have had. ? In regards to taking out an upgrade as it is a continuation of a previous agreement we are not able to cancel this as their is no cancellation period. I would like to investigate this for you further as I would like to come to a resolution that everyone is happy with. ? I have called you earlier on today and left a voicemail, I am sorry I missed you. What I have done is emailed me so that we can discuss this in more detail, as for security I am not able to discuss account specific information. ? I look forward to speaking to you. Kind regards, ? ? |
' + originalPoster + '
' + '' + $j('#formattedDescription' + pParentPostId).html() + '
' + '' + ''; // alert("quotePost: authorData=" + authorData + "; section=" + startSection); addTextToEdit(startSection); focusOnForm(); //alert('not yet implemented'); } function addTextToEdit(pNewText) { //alert("add this text: " + pNewText); //var theForm = window.opener.document.forms[fr.fieldFormNum]; $j('#elementDescription').html(pNewText); // if it's elementDescription or ekm, and it's richtext, then do a little extra //debugger; // If we're using TinyMCE on the page, and we can find a tinyMCE editor with this instanceID // Then update the TinyMCE content if (typeof(tinyMCE) != "undefined") { // Get an editor instance, and then set the content var thisTinyEditor = tinyMCE.getInstanceById('elementDescription'); if (thisTinyEditor) { thisTinyEditor.setContent(pNewText); } } } /* Display the reply post where appropriate. Used with threaded view 1. Figure out what existing post should be replied to 1.5: hide the current location 2. Move the form 2.5: change the PID (parentID) field 3. Reveal the data 4. Save the new location of the form, in case "Cancel" is clicked and we want to hide it */ function createReplyPost(pParentPostId, pOriginalText) { // Get the ID related to the post that should be replied to // the id is what comes after the "-" opDebug("createReplyPost: top - with realId=" + pParentPostId); // if the form is shown elsewhere, hide it first doHideForm(); //alert("show the div"); $j('#outercreate' + pParentPostId).fadeIn(200); //alert('faded in'); moveFormData(pParentPostId, pOriginalText); //$j('#outercreate' + realId).fadeIn(800); document.getElementById('PID').value = pParentPostId; // Set the id for the new location of the form opDebug("createReplyPost: about to update the editFormLocationId to=" + pParentPostId) document.getElementById('editFormLocationId').value = pParentPostId; } /* Hide the form identified in a hidden field. May be called by the included editpost_core.jsp */ function doHideForm() { var openFormFieldValue = document.getElementById('editFormLocationId').value; opDebug("doHideForm: value=" + openFormFieldValue); $j('#outercreate' + openFormFieldValue).fadeOut(300); } /* @param pParentId the ID of the post that is being replied to @param pSuppressCancel if true, then the form that gets filled in should not have a cancel button */ function moveFormData(pToLocationId, pOriginalText) { var openFormFieldValue = document.getElementById('editFormLocationId').value; opDebug("moveFormData: oldLocationId specified in hidden field=" + openFormFieldValue + "; move to location with id=" + pToLocationId + "; originalText=" + pOriginalText); // IF we know the old location, // THEN MOVE THE FORM // Note: For rich text, there's strange bugs with Firefox/jquery/tinyMCE, // So, we need to do some machinations: // - delete the text area // - move the whole editpost area // - make sure the whole area is shown/visible // - recreate the text area // - initialize the text area opDebug("moveFormData: about to remove from tinyMce") tinyMCE.execCommand('mceRemoveControl', false, 'elementDescription'); $j('.mceEditor').remove(); // todo: blank out the preview data in the form, if any. Otherwise, if a user moves the form when it's in // preview mode, it may look as if the input box still has real data. But it won't, really. document.getElementById("elementDescriptionpreviewData").innerHTML = ''; doEditAgain('elementDescription') // Move the editFormWrapper to another create location opDebug("moveFormData: about to move (jquery append) the form wrapper") $j('#outercreate' + pToLocationId).append( $j('#editFormWrapper')[0] ); opDebug("moveFormData: about to show using jquery") $j('#editFormWrapper').show(); opDebug("moveFormData: about to add a new textarea") $j('#richtext_div').append( $j('')); opDebug("moveFormData: about to add data to element Description - length=" + $j('#elementDescription').length) $j('#elementDescription').html(pOriginalText); opDebug("moveFormData: about to init the rich text field"); tinyMCE.execCommand('mceAddControl', true, 'elementDescription'); //$j('#creatediv').show('slow'); //$j('#create' + pParentId).load(url); } function extractAfter(pFullString, pAfterString) { var afterLoc = pFullString.indexOf(pAfterString); return pFullString.substring(afterLoc + 1); } function sendPost(pPostId) { var realId = pPostId; sendPostById(realId, ''); } function sendPostById(pPostId, pReportAbuse) { document.sendPostForm.ck.value = pPostId; document.sendPostForm.sendContentType.value = pReportAbuse; document.sendPostForm.submit(); } function printPost(pPostId) { document.printPostForm.postID.value = pPostId; document.printPostForm.submit(); } /* Do not get focus */ function opFocus() { } /* * Directs user to the edit post page */ function editPost(pPostId) { var realId = pPostId; window.location = '/pe/action/posts/editpostinit?EID=' + realId + '&returnUrl=%2Fpe%2Faction%2Fforums%2Fdisplaythread%3Fie%3Dx%2523e10391004%26postID%3D10391004%26postID%3D10391004'; }
Login Required
Only logged in members may join the conversation.| Options | |
| To sign up for notifications of comments on this item, you must first login. | |
| December 18, 2012 10:24 AM ?|? #2 Good afternoon chrislucas & welcome to the forums, ? First of all I would like to apologise for the service that you have received, we never like to hear that a customer is dissatisfied. I would like to take this opportunity to change the experience that you have had. ? In regards to taking out an upgrade as it is a continuation of a previous agreement we are not able to cancel this as their is no cancellation period. I would like to investigate this for you further as I would like to come to a resolution that everyone is happy with. ? I have called you earlier on today and left a voicemail, I am sorry I missed you. What I have done is emailed me so that we can discuss this in more detail, as for security I am not able to discuss account specific information. ? I look forward to speaking to you. Kind regards, ? ? |
' + originalPoster + '
' + '' + $j('#formattedDescription' + pParentPostId).html() + '
' + '' + ''; // alert("quotePost: authorData=" + authorData + "; section=" + startSection); addTextToEdit(startSection); focusOnForm(); //alert('not yet implemented'); } function addTextToEdit(pNewText) { //alert("add this text: " + pNewText); //var theForm = window.opener.document.forms[fr.fieldFormNum]; $j('#elementDescription').html(pNewText); // if it's elementDescription or ekm, and it's richtext, then do a little extra //debugger; // If we're using TinyMCE on the page, and we can find a tinyMCE editor with this instanceID // Then update the TinyMCE content if (typeof(tinyMCE) != "undefined") { // Get an editor instance, and then set the content var thisTinyEditor = tinyMCE.getInstanceById('elementDescription'); if (thisTinyEditor) { thisTinyEditor.setContent(pNewText); } } } /* Display the reply post where appropriate. Used with threaded view 1. Figure out what existing post should be replied to 1.5: hide the current location 2. Move the form 2.5: change the PID (parentID) field 3. Reveal the data 4. Save the new location of the form, in case "Cancel" is clicked and we want to hide it */ function createReplyPost(pParentPostId, pOriginalText) { // Get the ID related to the post that should be replied to // the id is what comes after the "-" opDebug("createReplyPost: top - with realId=" + pParentPostId); // if the form is shown elsewhere, hide it first doHideForm(); //alert("show the div"); $j('#outercreate' + pParentPostId).fadeIn(200); //alert('faded in'); moveFormData(pParentPostId, pOriginalText); //$j('#outercreate' + realId).fadeIn(800); document.getElementById('PID').value = pParentPostId; // Set the id for the new location of the form opDebug("createReplyPost: about to update the editFormLocationId to=" + pParentPostId) document.getElementById('editFormLocationId').value = pParentPostId; } /* Hide the form identified in a hidden field. May be called by the included editpost_core.jsp */ function doHideForm() { var openFormFieldValue = document.getElementById('editFormLocationId').value; opDebug("doHideForm: value=" + openFormFieldValue); $j('#outercreate' + openFormFieldValue).fadeOut(300); } /* @param pParentId the ID of the post that is being replied to @param pSuppressCancel if true, then the form that gets filled in should not have a cancel button */ function moveFormData(pToLocationId, pOriginalText) { var openFormFieldValue = document.getElementById('editFormLocationId').value; opDebug("moveFormData: oldLocationId specified in hidden field=" + openFormFieldValue + "; move to location with id=" + pToLocationId + "; originalText=" + pOriginalText); // IF we know the old location, // THEN MOVE THE FORM // Note: For rich text, there's strange bugs with Firefox/jquery/tinyMCE, // So, we need to do some machinations: // - delete the text area // - move the whole editpost area // - make sure the whole area is shown/visible // - recreate the text area // - initialize the text area opDebug("moveFormData: about to remove from tinyMce") tinyMCE.execCommand('mceRemoveControl', false, 'elementDescription'); $j('.mceEditor').remove(); // todo: blank out the preview data in the form, if any. Otherwise, if a user moves the form when it's in // preview mode, it may look as if the input box still has real data. But it won't, really. document.getElementById("elementDescriptionpreviewData").innerHTML = ''; doEditAgain('elementDescription') // Move the editFormWrapper to another create location opDebug("moveFormData: about to move (jquery append) the form wrapper") $j('#outercreate' + pToLocationId).append( $j('#editFormWrapper')[0] ); opDebug("moveFormData: about to show using jquery") $j('#editFormWrapper').show(); opDebug("moveFormData: about to add a new textarea") $j('#richtext_div').append( $j('')); opDebug("moveFormData: about to add data to element Description - length=" + $j('#elementDescription').length) $j('#elementDescription').html(pOriginalText); opDebug("moveFormData: about to init the rich text field"); tinyMCE.execCommand('mceAddControl', true, 'elementDescription'); //$j('#creatediv').show('slow'); //$j('#create' + pParentId).load(url); } function extractAfter(pFullString, pAfterString) { var afterLoc = pFullString.indexOf(pAfterString); return pFullString.substring(afterLoc + 1); } function sendPost(pPostId) { var realId = pPostId; sendPostById(realId, ''); } function sendPostById(pPostId, pReportAbuse) { document.sendPostForm.ck.value = pPostId; document.sendPostForm.sendContentType.value = pReportAbuse; document.sendPostForm.submit(); } function printPost(pPostId) { document.printPostForm.postID.value = pPostId; document.printPostForm.submit(); } /* Do not get focus */ function opFocus() { } /* * Directs user to the edit post page */ function editPost(pPostId) { var realId = pPostId; window.location = '/pe/action/posts/editpostinit?EID=' + realId + '&returnUrl=%2Fpe%2Faction%2Fforums%2Fdisplaythread%3Fie%3Dx%2523e10391004%26postID%3D10391004%26postID%3D10391004'; }
Login Required
Only logged in members may join the conversation.| Options | |
| To sign up for notifications of comments on this item, you must first login. | |
Source: http://support.phones4u.co.uk/pe/view.jsp?item=10391004
marlon byrd charles colson humber raffi torres michael mcdonald jon jones vs rashad evans earth day 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)